Pre-save review

Check a Spreadsheet Row Before Saving It

This checklist does not decide whether an item or seller is good. It forces each saved row to carry enough visible evidence to remain useful after the browsing session ends.

Give one point for each checklist item you can support with visible, relevant evidence. Do not award points for promises, assumptions, or information copied from a different item.

A score of 8–9 means the row is a strong shortlist candidate, not a verified product, seller, or transaction. Low-scoring rows should be researched further or removed for now.

Nine-point checklist

Use one checklist per distinct item or source. If two pages show different variations or contacts, score them separately.

  • The item belongs in the category I am researching.
  • The album or catalog photos show the details that matter.
  • Watermarks and contact details are reasonably consistent.
  • Sizing, measurements, or fit notes are visible when needed.
  • Price is compared with similar results rather than judged alone.
  • Shipping weight does not remove the value.
  • The source or purchase link matches the item being shown.
  • QC photos are relevant to the same item or source when available.
  • I can explain why I would save this result.

How to score a result

A point requires evidence. A clear side profile can support a footwear-photo check; a vague thumbnail cannot. A matching source-link title and item code can support link relevance; a redirect to a broad store page cannot.

8–9

Strong shortlist candidate, but still not verified.

5–7

Research further. Name the missing evidence.

3–4

Weak evidence. Keep only for a specific unresolved lead.

0–2

Remove for now. The row is not carrying its own context.

Do not increase a score because a page looks polished, appears high in search, uses confident language, or is shared by many people. Popularity and presentation are not checklist evidence.

Strong example

A traceable footwear row

The category is shoes. The item code is visible in the caption and repeated on the separate source page. Photos show both sides, heel, sole, toe, and material close-ups. The size chart explains its measurement basis. The price is compared with two similar sources, packed weight is estimated but clearly labelled, and relevant QC photos show the same color and code.

This could score highly because each point has a reason. It is still not proof of authenticity, quality, seller reliability, stock, delivery, or buyer protection.

Weak example

An attractive but unexplained row

The row says “best quality” and links to a single front photo. There is no code, rear view, size method, source link, price context, weight note, contact consistency check, or QC match. The destination is not labelled as an album, catalog, marketplace, or checkout.

This row is weak because it cannot answer the next research question. The promotional claim does not earn a point.

One-sentence save rule

Save the row only if you can complete this sentence: “I am keeping this result because the visible evidence shows ___, the source link matches ___, and I still need to check ___.”

What to do next

Use the category guide when you do not know which details matter. Use the QC guide when photo sets need comparison. Use the shipping-weight guide before deciding that a low item price is meaningful. Use the safety guide when contacts, watermarks, links, or payment claims are unclear.